Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 by the ld. PCIT - Neither the AO had enquired into the sources of cash deposits nor the appellant had offered any explanation in support of the sources for cash deposits. This clearly goes to prove the AO had failed to examine this issue during the course of original assessment proceedings, which rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by the ld. PCIT - Neither the AO had enquired into the sources of cash deposits nor the appellant had offered any explanation in support of the sources for cash deposits. This clearly goes to prove the AO had failed to examine this issue during the course of original assessment proceedings, which rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.