Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 14, 2023Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Admittedly, Distributorship Agreement between the parties is not disputed and the Appellant has claims against the Corporate Debtor. Appellant is free to take recourse to the mechanism as provided in the Distributorship Agreement for realisation of its dues. But present is not a case, where Section 9 proceedings under I&B Code can be initiated, when dispute is raised in reply to the Section 8 notice. - AT
Initiation of CIRP - Admittedly, Distributorship Agreement between the parties is not disputed and the Appellant has claims against the Corporate Debtor. Appellant is free to take recourse to the mechanism as provided in the Distributorship Agreement for realisation of its dues. But present is not a case, where Section 9 proceedings under I&B Code can be initiated, when dispute is raised in reply to the Section 8 notice. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
