Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening of assessment - In the impugned order, the Assessing Officer (AO) seems to have completely gone off the rails i.e., in a completely different direction, by adverting to the fact that petitioner/assessee entered into two sale transactions concerning penny stock scrips of Prikh Herbals Ltd./Safal Herbs Ltd. - Clearly, there is a dissonance between the show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b) and the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act. Thus the impugned order and notices are set aside. - HC
Validity of reopening of assessment - In the impugned order, the Assessing Officer (AO) seems to have completely gone off the rails i.e., in a completely different direction, by adverting to the fact that petitioner/assessee entered into two sale transactions concerning penny stock scrips of Prikh Herbals Ltd./Safal Herbs Ltd. - Clearly, there is a dissonance between the show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b) and the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act. Thus the impugned order and notices are set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.