Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the Appellant is an investment company incorporated on 30.01.2007 with unpredictable income/cash flows. This takes us to the method adopted by the Appellant for determining the value of shares of ECL - Rule 11UA is also based on Net Asset Value Approach adopted in the valuation report relied upon by the Appellant to support the valuation of shares of ECL - Valuation done by the assessee adopted - AT
TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the Appellant is an investment company incorporated on 30.01.2007 with unpredictable income/cash flows. This takes us to the method adopted by the Appellant for determining the value of shares of ECL - Rule 11UA is also based on Net Asset Value Approach adopted in the valuation report relied upon by the Appellant to support the valuation of shares of ECL - Valuation done by the assessee adopted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.