Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the Appellant is an investment company incorporated on 30.01.2007 with unpredictable income/cash flows. This takes us to the method adopted by the Appellant for determining the value of shares of ECL - Rule 11UA is also based on Net Asset Value Approach adopted in the valuation report relied upon by the Appellant to support the valuation of shares of ECL - Valuation done by the assessee adopted - AT
TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the Appellant is an investment company incorporated on 30.01.2007 with unpredictable income/cash flows. This takes us to the method adopted by the Appellant for determining the value of shares of ECL - Rule 11UA is also based on Net Asset Value Approach adopted in the valuation report relied upon by the Appellant to support the valuation of shares of ECL - Valuation done by the assessee adopted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
