Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Taxability - liable to central excise duty or taxable under the provisions of the service tax for providing works contract service - Revenue failed to establish that the partially fabricated goods removed from the factory were in marketable state. The whole case is made out on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. No inspection has been made by the Revenue at the factory premises of the appellant/assessee - Appellant had taken registration under the Service Tax Provisions for discharge of their tax liability - Demand under central excise set aside - AT
Taxability - liable to central excise duty or taxable under the provisions of the service tax for providing works contract service - Revenue failed to establish that the partially fabricated goods removed from the factory were in marketable state. The whole case is made out on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. No inspection has been made by the Revenue at the factory premises of the appellant/assessee - Appellant had taken registration under the Service Tax Provisions for discharge of their tax liability - Demand under central excise set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
