Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2981 to 3000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability - liable to central excise duty or taxable under the provisions of the service tax for providing works contract service - Revenue failed to establish that the partially fabricated goods removed from the factory were in marketable state. The whole case is made out on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. No inspection has been made by the Revenue at the factory premises of the appellant/assessee - Appellant had taken registration under the Service Tax Provisions for discharge of their tax liability - Demand under central excise set aside - AT
Taxability - liable to central excise duty or taxable under the provisions of the service tax for providing works contract service - Revenue failed to establish that the partially fabricated goods removed from the factory were in marketable state. The whole case is made out on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. No inspection has been made by the Revenue at the factory premises of the appellant/assessee - Appellant had taken registration under the Service Tax Provisions for discharge of their tax liability - Demand under central excise set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
