Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand of interest u/s 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - when the orders of the CESTAT Benches are considered, it is found that since the liability itself was questionable, the Revenue is not justified in demanding the interest also. - AT
Demand of interest u/s 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - when the orders of the CESTAT Benches are considered, it is found that since the liability itself was questionable, the Revenue is not justified in demanding the interest also. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.