Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Demand of interest u/s 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - when the orders of the CESTAT Benches are considered, it is found that since the liability itself was questionable, the Revenue is not justified in demanding the interest also. - AT
Demand of interest u/s 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - when the orders of the CESTAT Benches are considered, it is found that since the liability itself was questionable, the Revenue is not justified in demanding the interest also. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.