Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund of IGST - Refund to the SEZ when it is not required to actually fulfill the supplier’s obligation as has been reiteratively contended before this Court - Refund to IGST allowed - the respondent directed to grant the refund of ITC to the petitioner after proper verification and by obtaining a specific undertaking / bond from the petitioner where by stating that if the supplier at any point of time has taken refund and it comes to the notice of the department, then department will be in a position to recover it with interest. - HC
Refund of IGST - Refund to the SEZ when it is not required to actually fulfill the supplier’s obligation as has been reiteratively contended before this Court - Refund to IGST allowed - the respondent directed to grant the refund of ITC to the petitioner after proper verification and by obtaining a specific undertaking / bond from the petitioner where by stating that if the supplier at any point of time has taken refund and it comes to the notice of the department, then department will be in a position to recover it with interest. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.