Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Refund of IGST - Refund to the SEZ when it is not required to actually fulfill the supplier’s obligation as has been reiteratively contended before this Court - Refund to IGST allowed - the respondent directed to grant the refund of ITC to the petitioner after proper verification and by obtaining a specific undertaking / bond from the petitioner where by stating that if the supplier at any point of time has taken refund and it comes to the notice of the department, then department will be in a position to recover it with interest. - HC
Refund of IGST - Refund to the SEZ when it is not required to actually fulfill the supplier’s obligation as has been reiteratively contended before this Court - Refund to IGST allowed - the respondent directed to grant the refund of ITC to the petitioner after proper verification and by obtaining a specific undertaking / bond from the petitioner where by stating that if the supplier at any point of time has taken refund and it comes to the notice of the department, then department will be in a position to recover it with interest. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.