Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.