Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.