Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed limit from the provisions of Sec.40A(3) of the Act. - The assessee had also failed to make out a case of business exigency in making cash payment, because, it was the claim of the assessee that cash has been directly credited into bank accounts of sub-contractors and said bank accounts are maintained in one bank - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
