Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Seeking adjustment of GST amount deposited by the petitioner in the financial year 2018- 19, which inadvertently could not be deposited in the financial year 2017-18 - Both the assessing authority as well as the appellate authority have committed the said misreading of GSTR-9, hence both the impugned orders cannot stand and are set aside - the respondents are directed to adjust the amount of GST deposited by the petitioner. - HC
Seeking adjustment of GST amount deposited by the petitioner in the financial year 2018- 19, which inadvertently could not be deposited in the financial year 2017-18 - Both the assessing authority as well as the appellate authority have committed the said misreading of GSTR-9, hence both the impugned orders cannot stand and are set aside - the respondents are directed to adjust the amount of GST deposited by the petitioner. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.