Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that time - In the present case, admittedly, no assessment order has been passed nor any assessment order could be passed, the same having been barred by the provisions of Section 153(1)(a)(iii). - Respondents are directed to refund the excess amount deposited by the petitioner after deducting tax liability qua depreciation disallowance which stands admitted by the petitioner before Tribunal - HC
Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that time - In the present case, admittedly, no assessment order has been passed nor any assessment order could be passed, the same having been barred by the provisions of Section 153(1)(a)(iii). - Respondents are directed to refund the excess amount deposited by the petitioner after deducting tax liability qua depreciation disallowance which stands admitted by the petitioner before Tribunal - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
