Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of Customs duty - importer of vessel "M.V. Vishwa Yash" or not - deemed importer - as the permission was granted in favour of the SCI, the respondent cannot be said to be importer who has purchased the vessel which was delivered in its favour of 5-4-1997. - it cannot be said that the CESTAT and/or the High Court have committed any error in holding that the respondent cannot be said to be the importer and, therefore, not liable to pay the custom duty. - SC
Levy of Customs duty - importer of vessel "M.V. Vishwa Yash" or not - deemed importer - as the permission was granted in favour of the SCI, the respondent cannot be said to be importer who has purchased the vessel which was delivered in its favour of 5-4-1997. - it cannot be said that the CESTAT and/or the High Court have committed any error in holding that the respondent cannot be said to be the importer and, therefore, not liable to pay the custom duty. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.