Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of CGST u/s 54 - it was found that the vehicles mentioned in two invoices were not registered on the e-vahan portal. - Having established that the foundation of the Revenue’s appeal is flawed, the petitioner was not required to do anything more. The Appellate Authority did not find any flaw in the details as furnished by the petitioner. - HC
Refund of CGST u/s 54 - it was found that the vehicles mentioned in two invoices were not registered on the e-vahan portal. - Having established that the foundation of the Revenue’s appeal is flawed, the petitioner was not required to do anything more. The Appellate Authority did not find any flaw in the details as furnished by the petitioner. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
