Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Rejection of petitioner's request u/s 140(1) of the GST Act, 2017 for carrying forward of unutilized VAT TDS to the new GST regime without giving any reason - being a non-speaking order as no reasons have been given for rejecting the petitioner's request for carrying forward of the unadjusted VAT TDS to the GST regime that too when the law has been well settled now - claim allowed - HC
Rejection of petitioner's request u/s 140(1) of the GST Act, 2017 for carrying forward of unutilized VAT TDS to the new GST regime without giving any reason - being a non-speaking order as no reasons have been given for rejecting the petitioner's request for carrying forward of the unadjusted VAT TDS to the GST regime that too when the law has been well settled now - claim allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.