Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 on steamer agent - hat the confiscation of the said vessel for alleged violations of chapter VI of Customs Act, 1962 as well as the duty liability arising from misuse of ‘ship stores’ and ‘bunkers’ had been set aside by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, the related act of wrong-doing has ceased to be and consequently there is no scope for imposition of penalty - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 on steamer agent - hat the confiscation of the said vessel for alleged violations of chapter VI of Customs Act, 1962 as well as the duty liability arising from misuse of ‘ship stores’ and ‘bunkers’ had been set aside by the Tribunal. In such circumstances, the related act of wrong-doing has ceased to be and consequently there is no scope for imposition of penalty - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
