Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Departmental Eqquiry agaisnt the Revenue officer - alleged act or omission relating to exercise of his powers in the matter of passing orders of assessment/reassessment/refund of taxes to the dealers - This Court is of the considered view that although allegation of bias has been made but the allegations are not substantiated by any material or conduct of the inquiry officer in order to create any impression of bias against the petitioner, even remotely. - disciplinary proceedings to continue - HC
Validity of Departmental Eqquiry agaisnt the Revenue officer - alleged act or omission relating to exercise of his powers in the matter of passing orders of assessment/reassessment/refund of taxes to the dealers - This Court is of the considered view that although allegation of bias has been made but the allegations are not substantiated by any material or conduct of the inquiry officer in order to create any impression of bias against the petitioner, even remotely. - disciplinary proceedings to continue - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.