Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Maintainability of appeal - appropriate forum - High Court or Supreme Court - question is/was whether the respondents can be said to be manufacture of stators or not and therefore liable to pay central excise duty or not. - In the instant case, the dispute has no relation to the rate of duty or the value of the goods - the High Court has committed a very serious error in not entertaining the appeals and relegating the Revenue to prefer the appeals before this Court. - SC
Maintainability of appeal - appropriate forum - High Court or Supreme Court - question is/was whether the respondents can be said to be manufacture of stators or not and therefore liable to pay central excise duty or not. - In the instant case, the dispute has no relation to the rate of duty or the value of the goods - the High Court has committed a very serious error in not entertaining the appeals and relegating the Revenue to prefer the appeals before this Court. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
