Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of appeal - appropriate forum - High Court or Supreme Court - question is/was whether the respondents can be said to be manufacture of stators or not and therefore liable to pay central excise duty or not. - In the instant case, the dispute has no relation to the rate of duty or the value of the goods - the High Court has committed a very serious error in not entertaining the appeals and relegating the Revenue to prefer the appeals before this Court. - SC
Maintainability of appeal - appropriate forum - High Court or Supreme Court - question is/was whether the respondents can be said to be manufacture of stators or not and therefore liable to pay central excise duty or not. - In the instant case, the dispute has no relation to the rate of duty or the value of the goods - the High Court has committed a very serious error in not entertaining the appeals and relegating the Revenue to prefer the appeals before this Court. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.