Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Nature of income offered u/s 44BB - PE in India or not - Receipts from leasing/hiring of RIGs - sections 9(1)(vi), 44BB and 44DA apply in different situations. - The fundament error committed by learned DRP is in holding that section 44BB will be applicable only in a case where non-resident has a PE in India. The aforesaid conclusion of learned DRP is based on complete misinterpretation of the provision and goes against the very essence of the provision, which does not put the condition of existence of PE for applicability of the provision. - AT
Nature of income offered u/s 44BB - PE in India or not - Receipts from leasing/hiring of RIGs - sections 9(1)(vi), 44BB and 44DA apply in different situations. - The fundament error committed by learned DRP is in holding that section 44BB will be applicable only in a case where non-resident has a PE in India. The aforesaid conclusion of learned DRP is based on complete misinterpretation of the provision and goes against the very essence of the provision, which does not put the condition of existence of PE for applicability of the provision. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.