Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Clandestine Removal - 997.09 carats of diamonds and 98.34 carats of diamonds - processing loss - whether allegation of substitution of diamonds was established through the evidence? - HELD No - Insofar as shortage of 89.15 carats of diamonds is concerned, the same is argued to be treated as processing loss. The prosecution has failed to establish any clandestine removal of the same and could identify the person to whom the same were allegedly sold or transferred. - AT
Clandestine Removal - 997.09 carats of diamonds and 98.34 carats of diamonds - processing loss - whether allegation of substitution of diamonds was established through the evidence? - HELD No - Insofar as shortage of 89.15 carats of diamonds is concerned, the same is argued to be treated as processing loss. The prosecution has failed to establish any clandestine removal of the same and could identify the person to whom the same were allegedly sold or transferred. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
