Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Levy of penalty - abating the fraud - ex-superintendent of Central Excise with other person - Rebate claim - habitual offender - Appellant had perpetuated the fraud - The economic offenders/ white collared criminals need to be dealt in the strictest manner so as maintain uniformity and well being in the society and not endanger the economy of the country - It has been settled by various authorities that the word “possession” or similar phrases used in the statute do not imply physical possession of the goods but would imply possession in law. - AT
Levy of penalty - abating the fraud - ex-superintendent of Central Excise with other person - Rebate claim - habitual offender - Appellant had perpetuated the fraud - The economic offenders/ white collared criminals need to be dealt in the strictest manner so as maintain uniformity and well being in the society and not endanger the economy of the country - It has been settled by various authorities that the word “possession” or similar phrases used in the statute do not imply physical possession of the goods but would imply possession in law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.