Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment of excess service tax paid - ‘succeeding month or quarter’ used in Rule 6(4A) - There is no ambiguity in the wording of Rule 6(4A) ibid. - the filing of refund claim is not mandatory but then the adjustment under Rule 6(4A) ibid has to be done within a reasonable period if not in the immediate succeeding month or quarter - since no documentary evidence has been placed on record except the arithmetical calculation, therefore it cannot be concluded that any extra payment of tax has been made by the Appellant. - AT
Adjustment of excess service tax paid - ‘succeeding month or quarter’ used in Rule 6(4A) - There is no ambiguity in the wording of Rule 6(4A) ibid. - the filing of refund claim is not mandatory but then the adjustment under Rule 6(4A) ibid has to be done within a reasonable period if not in the immediate succeeding month or quarter - since no documentary evidence has been placed on record except the arithmetical calculation, therefore it cannot be concluded that any extra payment of tax has been made by the Appellant. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
