Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST - it can be seen that as against the abatement of 67% available under Notification No. 15/04-ST and 01/06-ST - the appellant have taken the abatement ranging from 30% to 48%. Thus, despite the availability of abatement as per the above notification, the appellant have paid the service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable. - AT
Denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST - it can be seen that as against the abatement of 67% available under Notification No. 15/04-ST and 01/06-ST - the appellant have taken the abatement ranging from 30% to 48%. Thus, despite the availability of abatement as per the above notification, the appellant have paid the service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
