Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4141 to 4160 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST - it can be seen that as against the abatement of 67% available under Notification No. 15/04-ST and 01/06-ST - the appellant have taken the abatement ranging from 30% to 48%. Thus, despite the availability of abatement as per the above notification, the appellant have paid the service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable. - AT
Denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST - it can be seen that as against the abatement of 67% available under Notification No. 15/04-ST and 01/06-ST - the appellant have taken the abatement ranging from 30% to 48%. Thus, despite the availability of abatement as per the above notification, the appellant have paid the service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
