Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme - payment after the cut of date - he petitioners have paid the amount from its bank account on 30.06.2020. The petitioners are not at fault for amount not transferred in the account of the Government by the bank on the same day on 30.06.2020 - for all intent and purpose, it cannot be said that the petitioners have failed to deposit the amount as required under Rule 7 of the Rules. - HC
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme - payment after the cut of date - he petitioners have paid the amount from its bank account on 30.06.2020. The petitioners are not at fault for amount not transferred in the account of the Government by the bank on the same day on 30.06.2020 - for all intent and purpose, it cannot be said that the petitioners have failed to deposit the amount as required under Rule 7 of the Rules. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.