Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJanuary 23, 2023Case LawsHC
Fraudulent/wrongful trading - It is clear from the language of section 66(1) that unlike application provided under section 43, section 45, section 50 and section 47 or avoiding of such transaction and dehors these provisions. - An application contemplated exclusively under section 66(1) is not made for avoidance of any transaction. Even if fraudulent but to fix the liabilities of the persons reasonable for conducting the business of corporate debtor which is fraudulent or wrongful, that too an application made by resolution professional during the CIRP or a liquidation process. - HC
Fraudulent/wrongful trading - It is clear from the language of section 66(1) that unlike application provided under section 43, section 45, section 50 and section 47 or avoiding of such transaction and dehors these provisions. - An application contemplated exclusively under section 66(1) is not made for avoidance of any transaction. Even if fraudulent but to fix the liabilities of the persons reasonable for conducting the business of corporate debtor which is fraudulent or wrongful, that too an application made by resolution professional during the CIRP or a liquidation process. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.