Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand raised u/s 200A - inadvertent mistake in mentioning wrong TAN - While depositing the TDS deducted, the assessee has wrongly mentioned the TAN allotted for Delhi office instead of Bina Madhya Pradesh Office. This fact was also brought to the notice of the Department immediately but the defect could not be cured in the absence of any provision for such type of rectification. - CIT(A) has taken a just and fair decision and reversed the demand u/s 200A - AT
Demand raised u/s 200A - inadvertent mistake in mentioning wrong TAN - While depositing the TDS deducted, the assessee has wrongly mentioned the TAN allotted for Delhi office instead of Bina Madhya Pradesh Office. This fact was also brought to the notice of the Department immediately but the defect could not be cured in the absence of any provision for such type of rectification. - CIT(A) has taken a just and fair decision and reversed the demand u/s 200A - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
