Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of notice issued u/s 23 of MVAT - the present is not a case where by a subsequent amendment, limitation has been enlarged even though the limitation prescribed under the earlier legislative provision has expired - no merit in the Petition. - HC
Validity of notice issued u/s 23 of MVAT - the present is not a case where by a subsequent amendment, limitation has been enlarged even though the limitation prescribed under the earlier legislative provision has expired - no merit in the Petition. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.