Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Denial of rightful claim of refund of service tax being the Petitioner is an exporter - Under Section 2(20) of Customs Act the term ‘exporter’ would include any owner or any person holding himself out to be the exporter. In other words, the person holding out to be the exporter need not be the exporter. - it was in fact the Assessee which was the real exporter of the goods for the purpose of Section 2(20) of the Act - the Court is unable to concur with the view of the Tribunal that in the present case the Assessee was not entitled to the refunds since it was not the exporter. - HC
Denial of rightful claim of refund of service tax being the Petitioner is an exporter - Under Section 2(20) of Customs Act the term ‘exporter’ would include any owner or any person holding himself out to be the exporter. In other words, the person holding out to be the exporter need not be the exporter. - it was in fact the Assessee which was the real exporter of the goods for the purpose of Section 2(20) of the Act - the Court is unable to concur with the view of the Tribunal that in the present case the Assessee was not entitled to the refunds since it was not the exporter. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.