Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-genuine purchases u/s 69C - Sales tax department had provided evidence of the fact that these parties did not undertake the sale of any material but only provided bills at a commission - ITAT upholding the orders of the CIT(A) deleting the addition - this is not a fit case for consideration in appeal as the substantial questions of law proposed by the revenue would not arise. - HC
Non-genuine purchases u/s 69C - Sales tax department had provided evidence of the fact that these parties did not undertake the sale of any material but only provided bills at a commission - ITAT upholding the orders of the CIT(A) deleting the addition - this is not a fit case for consideration in appeal as the substantial questions of law proposed by the revenue would not arise. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.