Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Insolvency and BankruptcyDecember 24, 2022Case LawsHC
CIRP - Seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator for the resolution of disputes between the parties - The purpose and rationale behind granting a moratorium is to ensure that the assets of the corporate debtor are protected, with an intention to keep the company a going concern and to use the period to strengthen its financial position. It means, the intent of the order of the NCLAT is to protect the assets of IL&FS and its group companies in order to make the resolution process effective/purposeful. - Since, the matter is pending before the Supreme Court and there is no stay of the NCLAT order - HC
CIRP - Seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator for the resolution of disputes between the parties - The purpose and rationale behind granting a moratorium is to ensure that the assets of the corporate debtor are protected, with an intention to keep the company a going concern and to use the period to strengthen its financial position. It means, the intent of the order of the NCLAT is to protect the assets of IL&FS and its group companies in order to make the resolution process effective/purposeful. - Since, the matter is pending before the Supreme Court and there is no stay of the NCLAT order - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
