Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Seeking grant of Regular bail - misuse of cheque discounting facilities - diversion and siphon-off the borrowed funds - section 447 of the Companies Act - Despite having the power under section 212(8) of the Companies Act, to arrest the petitioner in the course of investigation, the investigating officer did not arrest the petitioner, by which it can reasonably be inferred that the officer did not have reason to believe that the petitioner was guilty of any offence punishable under the concerned sections of the Companies Act - The petitioner is entitled to benefit of the proviso to section 212(6) of Companies Act - HC
Seeking grant of Regular bail - misuse of cheque discounting facilities - diversion and siphon-off the borrowed funds - section 447 of the Companies Act - Despite having the power under section 212(8) of the Companies Act, to arrest the petitioner in the course of investigation, the investigating officer did not arrest the petitioner, by which it can reasonably be inferred that the officer did not have reason to believe that the petitioner was guilty of any offence punishable under the concerned sections of the Companies Act - The petitioner is entitled to benefit of the proviso to section 212(6) of Companies Act - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
