Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Maintainability of appeal - non deposit of 7.5% of the amount of duty - delay in filing of appeal - observations are opined sufficient to falsify the allegations against the previous counsel that he was negligent and that he was responsible for these delay, as substantial as that of more than two and a half years, for filing the appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). There is not even any affidavit of the said previous counsel on record, acknowledging the alleged negligence on his part. - the appeal is dismissed - AT
Maintainability of appeal - non deposit of 7.5% of the amount of duty - delay in filing of appeal - observations are opined sufficient to falsify the allegations against the previous counsel that he was negligent and that he was responsible for these delay, as substantial as that of more than two and a half years, for filing the appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). There is not even any affidavit of the said previous counsel on record, acknowledging the alleged negligence on his part. - the appeal is dismissed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
