Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Ex-parte assessment order - service of notice - it is alleged that the orders have been issued in complete violation to section 73 (8) of the GST Act which prescribes minimum 30 days notice time - The notice dated 15.02.2021 (Annexure-P/4 series) directed the petitioner to file reply on 21st of February, 2021 which was within the period of 30 days. It is the mandate of law that 30 days’ period has to be afforded to the parties, which was not done in the instant case. - HC
Ex-parte assessment order - service of notice - it is alleged that the orders have been issued in complete violation to section 73 (8) of the GST Act which prescribes minimum 30 days notice time - The notice dated 15.02.2021 (Annexure-P/4 series) directed the petitioner to file reply on 21st of February, 2021 which was within the period of 30 days. It is the mandate of law that 30 days’ period has to be afforded to the parties, which was not done in the instant case. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
