Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Stay of demand - Addition u/s 68 - the Appellate Authority did not even deem it appropriate to decide the said application even when the Petitioner claims that a prayer was made for such a decision in that regard. - We stay the recovery based upon the impugned demand notices. Notwithstanding the fact that we have passed an interim order today, we direct the Appellate Authority to decide the application under Rule 46A, which is pending before it - HC
Stay of demand - Addition u/s 68 - the Appellate Authority did not even deem it appropriate to decide the said application even when the Petitioner claims that a prayer was made for such a decision in that regard. - We stay the recovery based upon the impugned demand notices. Notwithstanding the fact that we have passed an interim order today, we direct the Appellate Authority to decide the application under Rule 46A, which is pending before it - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
