Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notices - assessee did not participate in the assessment proceedings and ex parte order u/s 144 was passed - Even before us, after filing of the appeal, nobody has appeared. This appears to be a repeated pattern being adopted by the assessee to misuse the due process of law. - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notices - assessee did not participate in the assessment proceedings and ex parte order u/s 144 was passed - Even before us, after filing of the appeal, nobody has appeared. This appears to be a repeated pattern being adopted by the assessee to misuse the due process of law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.