Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notices - assessee did not participate in the assessment proceedings and ex parte order u/s 144 was passed - Even before us, after filing of the appeal, nobody has appeared. This appears to be a repeated pattern being adopted by the assessee to misuse the due process of law. - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notices - assessee did not participate in the assessment proceedings and ex parte order u/s 144 was passed - Even before us, after filing of the appeal, nobody has appeared. This appears to be a repeated pattern being adopted by the assessee to misuse the due process of law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.