Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice u/s 148-A - Reason to believe - Source of information is not relevant. What is relevant is the tangible material against the appellant. The petitioner did not even submit bank statements or the books of accounts. - There is, prima facie, some material on the basis of which the Department could reopen the case. - Writ Petition dismissed - Notice sustained - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice u/s 148-A - Reason to believe - Source of information is not relevant. What is relevant is the tangible material against the appellant. The petitioner did not even submit bank statements or the books of accounts. - There is, prima facie, some material on the basis of which the Department could reopen the case. - Writ Petition dismissed - Notice sustained - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.