Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade marks - violation of paragraph 2.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 - in terms of Rule 11 of IPR Enforcement Rules, the applicant cannot go into the question of infringement till the final adjudication of the present suit - The applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the adjudication of the suit. - HC
Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade marks - violation of paragraph 2.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 - in terms of Rule 11 of IPR Enforcement Rules, the applicant cannot go into the question of infringement till the final adjudication of the present suit - The applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the adjudication of the suit. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
