Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade marks - violation of paragraph 2.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 - in terms of Rule 11 of IPR Enforcement Rules, the applicant cannot go into the question of infringement till the final adjudication of the present suit - The applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the adjudication of the suit. - HC
Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade marks - violation of paragraph 2.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 - in terms of Rule 11 of IPR Enforcement Rules, the applicant cannot go into the question of infringement till the final adjudication of the present suit - The applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the adjudication of the suit. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
