Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure or admission made u/s 132(4) of the Act during the course of search proceedings - assessee has taken specific plea that no money, bullion or jewellery or income based on any entries in any books of account or other documents for these two assessment years was found during the course of search - AO should have rejected the explanation of the assessee by demonstrating it as incorrect. Rather, the authorities have proceeded on the assumption that had there been no money, bullion, jewellery or income based on entries was not found, the assessee would not have made voluntary disclosure of the income in his returns. - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure or admission made u/s 132(4) of the Act during the course of search proceedings - assessee has taken specific plea that no money, bullion or jewellery or income based on any entries in any books of account or other documents for these two assessment years was found during the course of search - AO should have rejected the explanation of the assessee by demonstrating it as incorrect. Rather, the authorities have proceeded on the assumption that had there been no money, bullion, jewellery or income based on entries was not found, the assessee would not have made voluntary disclosure of the income in his returns. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.