Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - provisional order of attachment - Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) - these two provisions cannot be applied to a transaction which took place prior to 01.11.2016. In that case, the transaction was dated 14.12.2011. Therefore, the show cause notice, provisional attachment order as well as the adjudicating order were declared null and void being without jurisdiction and consequently, quashed. - HC
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions - provisional order of attachment - Section 2(9)(A) and 2(9)(C) - these two provisions cannot be applied to a transaction which took place prior to 01.11.2016. In that case, the transaction was dated 14.12.2011. Therefore, the show cause notice, provisional attachment order as well as the adjudicating order were declared null and void being without jurisdiction and consequently, quashed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
