Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Levy of penalty - availing 100% credit instead of 50% and remaining 50% to be availed in the next Financial year in respect of capital goods - In this fact the case should have been concluded, on the basis of appellant’s reversal of excess credit of 50% along with payment of interest thereon which could have resulted into non issuance of SCN and consequently no penalty should have been imposed. Therefore, in this fact since there is no mala fide on the part of the appellant, the case is clearly covered by Section 11A(2B). - AT
Levy of penalty - availing 100% credit instead of 50% and remaining 50% to be availed in the next Financial year in respect of capital goods - In this fact the case should have been concluded, on the basis of appellant’s reversal of excess credit of 50% along with payment of interest thereon which could have resulted into non issuance of SCN and consequently no penalty should have been imposed. Therefore, in this fact since there is no mala fide on the part of the appellant, the case is clearly covered by Section 11A(2B). - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
