Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Exemption u/s 10(22) denied - Addition u/s 68 - the Stand taken by the assessee that contributions were received only from the students has been rightly rejected by the Assessing Officer. Further, the cash balance of Rs.1.30 Crores at the peak with petty cash being drawn on daily basis fortifies the view taken by the Assessing Officer that money was being utilized for some other purpose. - HC
Exemption u/s 10(22) denied - Addition u/s 68 - the Stand taken by the assessee that contributions were received only from the students has been rightly rejected by the Assessing Officer. Further, the cash balance of Rs.1.30 Crores at the peak with petty cash being drawn on daily basis fortifies the view taken by the Assessing Officer that money was being utilized for some other purpose. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.