Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification u/s 154 - claim the allowance of 50% of the expenses against the commission income - Since the assessee has himself not pressed the issue as to allowability of 50% of the expenses against the income earned in the original appeal filed before the Tribunal vide appeal for for A.Y. 2004-05 to A.Y 2010-11 decided against which miscellaneous application has also been dismissed, he is not entitled to re-agitate the same issue before the Tribuanl under the garb of filing application under section 154 of the Act before the AO and then filling the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the Tribunal. - AT
Rectification u/s 154 - claim the allowance of 50% of the expenses against the commission income - Since the assessee has himself not pressed the issue as to allowability of 50% of the expenses against the income earned in the original appeal filed before the Tribunal vide appeal for for A.Y. 2004-05 to A.Y 2010-11 decided against which miscellaneous application has also been dismissed, he is not entitled to re-agitate the same issue before the Tribuanl under the garb of filing application under section 154 of the Act before the AO and then filling the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the Tribunal. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
